Name | Nvidia RTX A5000 | Nvidia RTX A5500 |
Release Date | 12 April 2021 | 22 March 2022 |
Price | 2,508 USD | 5,401 USD |
GPU Score | ||
Brand | Nvidia | Nvidia |
Series | RTX | RTX |
The distinctions between the Tesla A5000 and A5500 are subtle and usually crystallized during performance testing. Based on the same chip and board design, their physical and hardware-related features are almost identical, which we will explore in later sections.
Nevertheless, The A5500 is a bit newer than the A5000 and includes certain optimizations, but it is priced at almost double the cost of the A5000. So, regarding sheer performance and benchmark numbers, the A5500 comes out on top of the A5000 in all sorts of applicability.
Both A5000 and A5500 entail an 8nm tech chip with a familiar amount of 28,300 Million transistors in each chip. They utilize the much-celebrated Ampere Architecture from Nvidia, which Ada Lovelace later replaced in their subsequent series of GPUs.
The 8nm chip and Ampere architecture are still going strong in 2024, even with the successful launch of Nvidia’s newest processing platform. This tech still provides substantial performance numbers for professional activities and gaming.
The die size is also identical. The die for both measures 628mm2, making their appearance and qualitative features kindred. As the GPU die sizes progress linearly with performance, the larger physical size of the chip is an excellent indication of a GPU’s performance. So, compared to other older GPUs, this die size shows a generationally enhanced graphics card capable of outputting massive benchmark scores.
GPU Name | Nvidia RTX A5000 | Nvidia RTX A5500 |
GPU Variant | - | - |
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Manufacturing Size | 8nm | 8nm |
Numbers of Transistors | 28,300 million | 28,300 million |
Die Size | 628 mm² | 628 mm² |
The GPU clock speeds for the A5500 and A5000 are where the first major distinction lies. The RTX A5000, despite its less efficient performance, harbors a strong clock speed of 1170 MHz – 1695 MHz. Whereas, the A5500 starts at 1080 MHz and maxes out at 1665 MHz.
This makes the A5000 a slightly better option for some selected scenarios where clock speed plays an imperative part in performing a task like gaming. However, the A5500 has a clever design that allows it to outpace the RTX A5000 by a considerable gap, despite having lower clock speeds, making it overall more effective and definitive in performance.
Nevertheless, both graphics processors share the same memory clock and memory type that operates at an outstanding speed of 2000 MHz.
Base Clock | 1170 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Memory Clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
The RTX A5000 and A5500 have a video memory capacity of 24 gigabytes. The 24 GB memory ensures you are getting an excellent amount of memory available for running hefty graphical simulations, animations, AI modeling, and games that simultaneously require multiple big data sets.
Moreover, both GPUs entertain a familiar 384-bit bus and 768 GB/sec of bandwidth. With this bandwidth and bus width, these GPUs easily handle big chunks of data faster, allowing speedy processing times and responsiveness. For reference, these Speeds are only second to the RTX 3090, the most efficiently performing card based on the same architecture and chip design.
There isn’t much difference in memory type, as both graphics cards use GDDR6. Although Nvidia has moved towards faster memory modules such as the GDDR6X, which offer only a slightly quicker processing time, the GDDR6 memory still works tremendously well for modern GPUs. AMD’s high-end mainstream GPUs also come with GDDR6 memory and can attain excellent performance rates.
Memory Size | 24GB | 24GB |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory Bus | 384 bit | 384 bit |
Bandwidth | 768.0 GB/s | 768.0 GB/s |
The A5000 and A5500 are both pretty big GPUs, and they are both compatible with the PCIe 4.0 16-lane slots, measuring full length according to the conventional size for mainstream interconnectivity. As a rule of thumb, an entire lane utilization is always suitable for a graphics card because it maximizes the data transfer rates.
They span a length of 267mm and a 112mm width, making them much less thicker and lengthier than some high-end mainstream GPUs. Both GPUs consist of a blower cooler, and their whole size is nominal in terms of thermal viability. Additionally, the thickness and length ratings consider the overall size of the graphics card. This means that you can easily fit these GPUs into a standard-sized PC or desktop without running out of space.
Furthermore, both feature a single type of multiple display output ports with the option of four DisplayPort 1.4a Ports at the periphery. Considering that the DP 1.4a ports are the most contemporary iteration of DisplayPorts and provide an excellent bandwidth/resolution limit, the lack of HDMI 2.1 ports becomes less worrying.
Number of Slots | Nvidia RTX 3090 | AMD RX 5700 XT |
Lenght | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Width | 112 mm | 112 mm |
Height | - | - |
TDP | 230W | 230W |
Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Suggested PSU | 550W | 550W |
Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Direct X | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |